Predicting BER value in OFDM-FSO systems using Machine Learning techniques

Ranim Younes, Fadi Ghosna1, Mohammad Nassr, Mohammad Anbar, Hamid Ali Abed Alasadi


Descargar artículo

Información básica

Volumen

V55 - N4 / 2022 Ordinario

Referencia

51114

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.7149/OPA.55.4.51114

Idioma

English

Etiquetas

Free Space Optics (FSO), OFDM, Optisystem, Machine Learning Algorithms (MLA), Prediction, Regression, Support Vector Regression (SVR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Bit Error Rate (BER).

Resumen

Recently, Free Space Optics (FSO) has emerged as new technology for transmission through atmosphere. It is difficult to implement FSO systems under bad weather conditions such as fog and rain and so on. These conditions cause deterioration in the FSO system signal. Thus OFDM technology has been used to enhance system performance and to overcome signal weakness due to weather conditions. Machine Learning Algorithms (MLAs) are good prediction tools which can improveperformances of communication networksin general. In this work, three of machine learning algorithms (namely: Support Vector Regression (SVR), Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF)) have been used to estimate the value of Bit Error Rate (BER). A data set has been obtained from Optisystem v.15 for training and testing MLAs modelsunder different weather conditions (Fog, Rain, Clear). The obtained results show that SVR algorithm cannot be used to predict BER value in the OFDM-FSO system. RF and DT algorithms gave approximate results. RF gave better accuracy where it has the greatest value of determination coefficient (R2) and the smallest value of Mean Square Error (MSE) compared to other algorithms.

Referencias

1

Kim, Isaac &Korevaar, Eric, “Availability of free space optics (FSO) and hybrid FSO/RF systems,” Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 4530. 10.1117/12.449800 (2001).

2

X. Zhu and J. M. Kahn, "Pairwise codeword error probability for coded free-space optical communication through atmospheric turbulence channels," ICC 2001. IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37240), pp. 161-164 vol.1, doi: 10.1109/ICC.2001.936294 (2001).

3

Narimane, Hadjadji&Hamdi, Rachid, “Nonlinearity mitigation of self-phase modulation effect in coherent optical system,” Journal of Optical Communications. 10.1515/joc-2021-0138 (2022).

4

M. A. Khalighi and M. Uysal, "Survey on Free Space Optical Communication: A Communication Theory Perspective," in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2231-2258, Fourthquarter , doi: 10.1109/COMST.2014.2329501 (2014).

5

Arun K. Majumdar, Jennifer C. Ricklin, "Free-Space Laser Communications Principles and advances", Springer Science+Business Media LLC, ISBN-13: 978-0-387-28652-5,pp.1-25 (2008).

6

Alkholidi, Abdulsalam, “Free Space Optical Communications — Theory and Practices,” doi: 10.5772/58884 (2014).

7

Mansour, Ali &Mesleh, Raed&Abaza, Mohamed, “New Challenges in Wireless \& Free Space Optical Communications,” Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 89. 10.1016/j.optlaseng .03.027 (2016).

8

Bukola, Ajewole&Owolawi, P. &Srivastava, Viranjay, “ Error Performance of Coded BPSK OFDM-FSO System under Atmospheric Turbulence,” Journal of Communications. 936-944. 10.12720/jcm.14.10.936-944 (2019).

9

Esmail, Maged&Saif, Waddah&Ragheb, A. &Alshebeili, Saleh, “ Free space optic channel monitoring using machine learning,” Optics Express. 29. 10.1364/OE.416777 (2021).

10

F. Aveta, H. H. Refai and P. G. Lopresti, "Cognitive Multi-Point Free Space Optical Communication: Real-Time Users Discovery Using Unsupervised Machine Learning," in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 207575-207588, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3038624 (2020).

11

A. A. Algedir and T. Y. Elganimi, "Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Quality Factor of FSO Systems with Multiple Transceivers," 2020 2nd Global Power, Energy and Communication Conference (GPECOM) , pp. 308-311, doi: 10.1109/GPECOM49333.2020.9247939 (2020).

12

F. Aveta, A. Algedir and H. Refai, "Quality of Transmission Estimation for Multi-User Free Space Optical Communication Using Supervised Machine Learning," 2021 IEEE Cognitive Communications for Aerospace Applications Workshop (CCAAW), pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/CCAAW50069.2021.9527304 (2021).

13

Amirabadi, Mohammad &Kahaei, Mohammad &Nezamalhosseni, S. ," Low complexity deep learning algorithms for compensating atmospheric turbulence in the free space optical communication system," IET Optelectronics. 10.1049/ote2.12060 (2021).

14

Kumar, Lepuri& Krishnan, Prabu&Shreya, Biradher& S. ,Sudhakar, "Performance enhancement of FSO communication system using machine learning for 5G/6G and IOT applications," Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics. 252. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.168430 (2022).

15

Fan, Yuchuan&Udalcovs, Aleksejs&Spolitis, Sandies& Yu, Xianbin&Ozolins, Oskars, " Linear Regression vs. Deep Learning for Signal Quality Monitoring in Coherent Optical Systems," IEEE PHOTONICS JOURNAL, VOL. 14, AUGUST (2022).

16

Sharma, Vishal &Chaudhary, Sushank, “High speed CO-OFDM-FSO transmission system,” Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics. 125. 1761–1763. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.10.010 (2014).

17

Sharma, Vishal &Chaudhary, Sushank, “ Implementation of Hybrid OFDM-FSO Transmission System,” International Journal of Computer Applications, 58. 37-40. 10.5120/9305-3531 (2012).

18

F. Hario, E. Maulana, S. H. Pramono, S. N. Sari and A. M. Al Junaedi, "Design of OFDM-FSO Communication System on High Data Rate for Tropical Climate Region," 2019 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC), pp. 74-78, doi: 10.1109/ATC.2019.8924543 (2019).

19

H. Kaushal and G. Kaddoum, "Optical Communication in Space: Challenges and Mitigation Techniques," in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 57-96, Firstquarter , doi: 10.1109/COMST.2016.2603518 (2017).

20

Kim, Isaac &Mcarthur, Bruce &Korevaar, Eric, “ Comparison of laser beam propagation at 785 nm and 1550 nm in fog and haze for optical wireless communications, ” Proc. SPIE. 4214. 10.1117/12.417512 (2001).

21

P. W. Kruse, L. D. McGlauchlin, and R. B. McQusitan, Elements of Infrared Technology: Generation, Transmission and Detection. Wiley, (1962).

22

ITU, “ Prediction Methods Required for the design for terrestrial Free-Space Optical Links,” Recommendation ITU-R P.1814 (2007).

23

W. S. Saif, M. A. Esmail, A. M. Ragheb, T. A. Alshawi and S. A. Alshebeili, "Machine Learning Techniques for Optical Performance Monitoring and Modulation Format Identification: A Survey," in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2839-2882, Fourthquarter , doi: 10.1109/COMST.2020.3018494 (2020).

24

A.Botchkarev," Performance Metrics (Error Measures) in Machine Learning Regression, Forecasting and prognostics: Properties and Typology," 1809.03006 (2018).