Inspecting the use of SLMs for the control of photonic quantum states

S. Bordakevich, D. Pabón, L. Rebón, S. Ledesma


Download Paper

Base Information

Volume

V56 - N2 / 2023 Especial: Óptica y Fotónica en Argentina

Reference

51147

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.7149/OPA.56.2.51147

Language

English

Keywords

Spatial light modulators, twin photon sources, spatial correlations

Abstract

Spatial light modulators (SLMs) are widely used to coherently control quantum states of light. When carrying out these experiments, some assumptions are made. For instance, it is supposed that the position-momentum correlations between twin photon pairs are not affected by the use of a liquid crystal display (LCD) as a SLM. Furthermore, it is assumed that the characterization of such devices performed with an intense laser source, is still valid in the single photon regime. In this work, we show that such assumptions are acceptable, within the experimental uncertainties, for a liquid crystal on silicon (LCoS) display. This is especially important when considering the use of this kind of displays for the coherent control of quantum states based on twin photon sources.

References

1

G. Lima, A. Vargas, L. Neves, R. Guzmán, C. Saavedra, "Manipulating spatial qudit states with programmable optical devices" Opt. Express 17 (13), 10688 (2009).

2

G. Lima, L. Neves, R. Guzmán, E. S. Gómez, W. A. T. Nogueira, A. Delgado, A. Vargas, C. Saavedra, "Experimental quantum tomography of photonic qudits via mutually unbiased basis" Opt. Express 19 (4), 3542 (2011).

3

J. J. M. Varga, L. Rebón, Q. Pears Stefano, C. Iemmi, "Characterizing d-dimensional quantum channels by means of quantum process tomography" Opt. Lett. 43 (18), 4398 (2018).

4

D. Pabón, L. Rebón, S. Bordakevich, N. Gigena, A. Boette, C. Iemmi, R. Rossignoli, S. Ledesma, “Parallel-in-time optical simulation of history states” Phys. Rev. A 99, 062333 (2019).

5

H. Defienne, M. Reichert, J. W. Fleischer, "Adaptive Quantum Optics with Spatially Entangled Photon Pairs " Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (23), 233601 (2018).

6

F. Flamini, N. Spagnolo, F. Sciarrino, “Photonic quantum information processing: a review” Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 016001 (2018).

7

S.P. Walborn, C.H. Monken, S. Pádua, P.H. Souto Ribeiro, “Spatial correlations in parametric down-conversion” Phys. Rep 495, 87-139 (2010).

8

M. D’Angelo, Y. Kim, S. P. Kulik, Y. Shih, "Identifying Entanglement Using Quantum Ghost Interference and Imaging" Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (23), 233601 (2004).

9

J. C. Howell, R. S. Bennink, S. J. Bentley, R.W. Boyd, "Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Using Momentum and Position-Entangled Photons from Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion" Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (21), 210403 (2004).

10

J. Schneeloch, J. C. Howell, "Introduction to the transverse spatial correlations in spontaneous parametric down-conversion through the biphoton birth zone " J. Opt. 18, 053501 (2016).

11

A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, "Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?" Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).

12

S. Mancini, V. Giovannetti, D. Vitali, P. Tombesi, "Entangling Macroscopic Oscillators Exploiting Radiation Pressure" Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (12), 120401 (2002).

13

W. Zhang, R. Fickler, E. Giese, L. Chen, R. Boyd, "Influence of pump coherence on the generation of position-momentum entanglement in optical parametric down-conversion" Opt. Express 27 (15), 20745 (2019).

14

D. Defienne, S. Gigan, "Spatially entangled photon-pair generation using a partial spatially coherent pump beam" Phys. Rev. A 99 (5), 053831 (2019).

15

M. P. Almeida, S. P. Walborn, P. H. Souto Ribeiro, "Experimental investigation of quantum key distribution with position and momentum of photon pairs" Phys. Rev. A. 72 (2), 022313 (2005).

16

P. B. Dixon, G. A. Howland, J. Schneeloch, J. C. Howell, "Quantum Mutual Information Capacity for High-Dimensional Entangled States" Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (14), 143603 (2012).

17

L. Achatz, E. A. Ortega, K. Dovzhik, R. F. Shiozaki, J. Fuenzalida, S. Wengerowsky, M. Bohmann, R. Ursin, "Certifying position-momentum entanglement at telecommunication wavelengths" Phys. Scr. 97, 015101 (2022).

18

M. P. Edgar, D. S. Tasca, F. Izdebski, R. E. Warburton, J. Leach, M. Agnew, G. S. Buller, R. W. Boyd, M. J. Padgett, "Imaging high-dimensional spatial entanglement with a camera" Nat. Comm. 3, 984 (2012).

19

P. Moreau, F. Devaux, E. Lantz, " Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox in Twin Images" Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (16), 160401 (2014).

20

B. Eckmann, B. Bessire, M. Unternahrer, L. Gasparini, M. Perenzoni, A. Stefanov, "Characterization of space-momentum entangled photons with a time resolving CMOS SPAD array" Opt. Express 28 (21), 31553 (2020).

21

A. Bhattacharjee, N. Meher, A. K. Jha, "Measurement of two-photon position–momentum Einstein– Podolsky–Rosen correlations through single-photon intensity measurements" New J. Phys. 24, 053033 (2022).

22

C. Wang, C. Lee, Y. Kim, "Generation and characterization of position-momentum entangled photon pairs in a hot atomic gas cell" Opt. Express 27 (24), 34611 (2019).

23

S. Chandrasekhar, Liquid Crystals, 2nd ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (1992).

24

M. M. Hayat, S. N. Torres, L. M. Pedrotti, "Theory of photon coincidence statistics in photon-correlated beams" Opt. Comunn. 169, 275-287 (1999).

25

E. Giese, R. Fickler, W. Zhang, L. Chen, R. W. Boyd, "Influence of pump coherence on the quantum properties of spontaneous parametric down-conversion" Phys. Scr. 93 (8), 084001 (2018).

26

E. Chironi, C. Iemmi, "Error analysis and compensation for a discrete dual rotating retarder Mueller matrix polarimeter" Appl. Opt. 59 (21), 6368 (2020).