Fabry Perot detector for low coherence interferometry

S. Cerrotta, J.R. Torga, E.N. Morel


Download Paper

Base Information

Volume

V56 - N2 / 2023 Especial: Óptica y Fotónica en Argentina

Reference

51130

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.7149/OPA.56.2.51130

Language

Spanish

Keywords

Low coherence interferometry, FD-LCI, Fabry Perot cavities, spectral detectors

Abstract

Two theoretical detector have been designed for different wavelengths based on Fabry Perot cavities for application in the frequency domain low coherence interference (FD-LCI) technique. A one-dimensional axial detector consisting of a variable-width cavity with a photodiode and another radial detector with fixed cavity with a linear array or camera. Theoretical feasibility was demonstrated by performing simulations of Gaussian beams propagating through cavities with different characteristics. The parameters were optimized in order the detectors are centered at 850 nm, with ranges of 60 nm and resolution below the nanometer for waist beam of 500 µm, typical conditions of the sources and detectors used in FD-LCI. In addition, the design contemplates the possibility of using them simultaneously.

References

1

C. K. Hitzenberger, “Measurement of corneal thickness by low-coherence interferometry,” Appl. Opt., vol. 31, no. 31, p. 6637, 1992.

2

W. Drexler and J. G. Fujimoto, “Optical coherence tomography: Technology and applications, second edition,” Opt. Coherence Tomogr. Technol. Appl. Second Ed., pp. 1–2571.

3

N. R. Huber and A. Ferrero, “Advances in broad bandwidth light sources for ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography,” 2004.

4

J. Fujimoto and E. Swanson, “The development, commercialization, and impact of optical coherence tomography,” Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. OCT1–OCT13, 2016.

5

J. Park, J.-A. Kim, H. Ahn, J. Bae, and J. Jin, “A Review of Thickness Measurements of Thick Transparent Layers Using Optical Interferometry,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 463– 477, 2019.

6

M. Kogel-Hollacher, S. Andre, and T. Beck, “Low-coherence interferometry in laser processing: a new sensor approach heading for industrial applications,” Interferom. XIX SPIE, vol. 10749, pp. 319--329, 2018.

7

S. Cerrotta, E. N. Morel, F. C. Alvira, and J. R. Torga, “Large axial range frequency-domain optical low coherence interferometry,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett., vol. 31, no. 2, 2019

8

L. J. Cusato, S. Cerrotta, J. R. Torga, and E. N. Morel, “Extending low-coherence interferometry dynamic range using heterodyne detection,” Opt. Lasers Eng., vol. 131, 2020.

9

M. Sallese, P. Tabla, S. Cerrotta, N. E. Morel, and R. J. Torga, “Desarrollo de un equipo basado en un interferómetro de baja coherencia para medición de topografía y tomografía de materiales,” in XI Corende, 2017.

10

S. Kim, M. Crose, W. J. Eldridge, B. Cox, W. J. Brown, and A. Wax, “Design and implementation of a low-cost, portable OCT system,” Biomed. Opt. Express, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 1232, 2018.

11

G. Liu, M. Han, and W. Hou, “High-resolution and fast-response fiber-optic temperature sensor using silicon Fabry-Pérot cavity,” Opt. Express, vol. 23, no. 6, p. 7237, 2015.

12

T. Steinmetz, T. Wilken, C. Araujo-Hauck, R. Holzwarth, T. W. Hänsch, and T. Udem, “Fabry-Pérot filter cavities for wide-spaced frequency combs with large spectral bandwidth,” Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt., vol. 96, no. 2–3, pp. 251–256, 2009.

13

A. P. Jathoul et al., “Deep in vivo photoacoustic imaging of mammalian tissues using a tyrosinase-based genetic reporter,” Nat. Photonics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 239–246, 2015.

14

E. Zhang, J. Laufer, and P. Beard, “Backward-mode multiwavelength photoacoustic scanner using a planar Fabry-Perot polymer film ultrasound sensor.pdf,” vol. 47, no. 4, 2008.

15

D. Hunger, T. Steinmetz, Y. Colombe, C. Deutsch, T. W. Hänsch, and J. Reichel, “A fiber Fabry-Perot cavity with high finesse,” New J. Phys., vol. 12, 2010.

16

J. Aasi et al., “Advanced LIGO,” Class. Quantum Gravity, vol. 32, no. 7, 2015.

17

Y. Tsujiie and Y. Kawamura, “Micro Fabry-Pérot Interferometer at Rayleigh Range,” Sci. Rep., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2018.

18

J. Degallaix, “OSCAR a Matlab based optical FFT code,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 228, 2010.

19

M. Choma, M. Sarunic, C. Yang, and J. Izatt, “Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express, vol. 11, no. 18, p. 2183, 2003.

20

T. J. Eom et al., “Narrowband wavelength selective detector applicable SD-OCT based on Fabry-Perot tunable filter and balanced photoreceiver,” Coherence Domain Opt. Methods Opt. Coherence Tomogr. Biomed. XII, vol. 6847, no. 2008, p. 68470R, 2008.

21

S. Cerrotta, E. N. Morel, and J. R. Torga, “Interferencia de anillos con haces gaussianos y esféricos en Cavidades Fabry Perot medianas,” Ajea, no. 5, 2020.

22

H. Kogelnik and T. Li, “Laser Beams and Resonators,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 1312–1329, 1966.

23

T. D. Visser and E. Wolf, “The origin of the Gouy phase anomaly and its generalization to astigmatic wavefields,” Opt. Commun., vol. 283, no. 18, pp. 3371–3375, 2010.

24

D. M. Marques, J. A. Guggenheim, R. Ansari, E. Z. Zhang, P. C. Beard, and P. R. T. Munro, “Modelling Fabry-Pérot etalons illuminated by focussed beams,” Opt. Express, vol. 28, no. 5, p. 7691, 2020.

25

H. Abu-Safia, R. Al-Tahtamouni, I. Abu-Aljarayesh, and N. A. Yusuf, “Transmission of a Gaussian beam through a Fabry–Perot interferometer,” Appl. Opt., vol. 33, no. 18, p. 3805, 1994.

26

Y. Bao, F. Zhou, T. W. LeBrun, and J. J. Gorman, “Concave silicon micromirrors for stable hemispherical optical microcavities,” Opt. Express, vol. 25, no. 13, p. 15493, 2017.