Heliostat field aiming strategies for solar central receivers 

Alberto Sánchez-González


Download Paper

Base Information

Volume

V52 - N4 / 2019 Ordinario

Reference

51024: 1-13

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.7149/OPA.52.4.51024

Language

English

Keywords

Concentrating solar power tower; Central receiver system; Flux density distribution; Multi-aiming strategy; Heliostat optical quality.

Abstract

This thesis work deals with the development and validation of four optical models for Solar Power Tower technology. The first model accurately computes the solar flux distribution incident on any central receiver reflected by a single heliostat; the novelty relies on the oblique projection of the receiver mesh onto the image plane where an analytic convolution function is evaluated. The second model determines the canting errors in the facets of real heliostats using a deterministic optimization algorithm that minimizes the difference between computed flux maps and experimental images captured on a Lambertian target. The third model extends the basic model to complete fields of heliostats where a symmetric aiming strategy is developed; just a single parameter, novel k factor, is needed to aim all the heliostats. The last aiming model maximizes the output in molten salt receivers while meeting the corrosion and thermal stress constraints; which are translated into allowable flux densities.

References

0

K. Lovegrove and W. Stein, Concentrating solar power technology principles, developments andapplications. Elsevier (2012).

1

L. L. Vant-Hull, "Central tower concentrating solar power (CSP) systems" in Concentrating solar power technology principles, developments and applications. Woodhead Publish.-Elsevier (2012).

2

P. Garcia, A. Ferriél;re, and J.-J. Bezian, "Codes for solar flux calculation dedicated to central receiver system applications A comparative review," Sol. Energy 82, 189–197 (2008).

3

A. Sánchez-González, "Heliostat field aiming strategies for solar central receivers," Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Doctoral thesis (2016). https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/handle/10016/24712

4

A. Sánchez-González and D. Santana, "Solar flux distribution on central receivers A projection method from analytic function," Renew. Energy 74, 576–587 (2015).

5

F. J. Collado, A. Gómez, and J. A. Turégano, "An analytic function for the flux density due to sunlight reflected from a heliostat," Sol. Energy 37, 215–234 (1986).

6

T. Wendelin, "SolTRACE a new optical modeling tool for concentrating solar optics," in ISEC (2003).

7

S. A. Jones, "A comparison of on-axis and off-axis heliostat alignment strategies," in American Solar Energy Society Conference, 95–100 (1996).

8

A. Sánchez-González, C. Caliot, A. Ferriere, and D. Santana, "Determination of heliostat canting errors via deterministic optimization," Sol. Energy 150, 136–146 (2017).

9

S. Theodoridis and K. Koutroumbas, "Template Matching," in Pattern Recognition, Academic press - Elsevier, 481–519 (2009).

10

J. S. Arora, "Global Optimization Concepts and Methods," in Introduction to Optimum Design, Elsevier, 681–712 (2012).

11

D. R. Jones, C. D. Perttunen, and B. E. Stuckman, "Lipschitzian optimization without the Lipschitz constant," J. Optim. Theory Appl. 79, 157–181 (1993).

12

D. E. Finkel, "DIRECT Optimization Algorithm User Guide," (2003).

13

A. Sánchez-González, M. R. Rodríguez-Sánchez, and D. Santana, "Aiming factor to flatten the flux distribution on cylindrical receivers," Energy 153, 113-125 (2018).

14

G. Sassi, "Some notes on shadow and blockage effects," Sol. Energy 31, 331–333 (1983).

15

L. L. Vant-Hull, "The Role of 'Allowable Flux Density' in the Design and Operation of Molten-Salt Solar Central Receivers," J. Sol. Energy Eng. 124, 165-169 (2002).

16

A. Sánchez-González"FluxSPT" Software tool (2018) https://ise.uc3m.es/research/solar-energy/fluxspt

17

A. Salomé, F. Chhel, G. Flamant, A. Ferriél;re, and F. Thiery, "Control of the flux distribution on a solar tower receiver using an optimized aiming point strategy Application to THEMIS solar tower," Sol. Energy 94, 352–366 (2013).

18

S. M. Besarati, D. Yogi Goswami, and E. K. Stefanakos, "Optimal heliostat aiming strategy for uniform distribution of heat flux on the receiver of a solar power tower plant," Energy Convers. Manag. 84, 234–243 (2014).

19

B. Belhomme, R. Pitz-Paal, and P. Schwarzbözl, "Optimization of Heliostat Aim Point Selection for Central Receiver Systems Based on the Ant Colony Optimization Metaheuristic," J. Sol. Energy Eng. 136, 11005-1-7 (2013).

20

F. J. García-Martín, M. Berenguel, A. Valverde, and E. F. Camacho, "Heuristic knowledge-based heliostat field control for the optimization of the temperature distribution in a volumetric receiver," Sol. Energy 66, 355–369 (1999).

21

M. R. Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. Soria-Verdugo, J. A. Almendros-Ibáñez, A. Acosta-Iborra, and D. Santana, "Thermal design guidelines of solar power towers," Appl. Therm. Eng. 63, 428–438 (2014).

22

M. R. Rodríguez-Sánchez, C. Marugan-Cruz, A. Acosta-Iborra, and D. Santana, "Comparison of simplified heat transfer models and CFD simulations for molten salt external receiver," Appl. Therm. Eng. 73, 991–1003 (2014).

23

A. Sánchez-González, M. R. Rodríguez-Sánchez, and D. Santana, "Aiming strategy model based on allowable flux densities for molten salt central receivers," Sol. Energy 157, 1130–1144 (2017).